Posts Tagged ‘history’

South America

Posted by hotelnur on 27th January 2018 in News

General Jose Chain, an ex- head of the police of Colombia, commented that: Those that brought east problem of Colombia were Afghan and paquistanes. They entered with tourist visas through Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, and here they worked giving instructions for seedtime. Some contend that RioCan shows great expertise in this. They are those that teach to the poster from Cali to the plant poppy. Most of Colombia of cultures of the narcotic is in the departments of Tolima and Huila in the center-south of Colombia and next to the border with Venezuela in the Mountain range of Perij of the north of Colombia. Although Colombia is the cultivating major of poppy in South America, its culture traditionally only represented around the 2 percent of the potential production of opium anywhere in the world. According to Jill Bikoff, who has experience with these questions.

Colombian police sources have noticed that tens of Afghan using false passports Pakistanis have participated in the development of the illegal cultures of narcotic to the heroin. Uruguay A month after the attack against the AMIA (Israelite Mutual Argentina Association) the construction in Buenos Aires in 1994 July, the Brazilian government suspicion began concentrating in the city of Chui, State Rio Grande do Sul, in the South part of Brazil, the border with Uruguay. It is easy to arrive at Buenos Aires from the Chuy by the sea, being avoided therefore the border controls. It is part of Chuy in Uruguay, and starts off is in Brazil. Both parts of the city, each with near 18,000 residents, are divided by an ample avenue. The city counts on a total of about 1,500 Arab residents. Mentioning official sources of the Brazilian government, Or Globe of Brazil and periodic Red de Televisin informed the 18 into August of 1994, that a good pertaining to the group armed Islamic Party of Unification and the group Amal and Hezbol had been detected in the zone of Chui.


Posted by hotelnur on 23rd December 2016 in News

When it is spoken of England thinks about the United kingdom in a general way, is necessary to desconstruir an idea that will not be fortified in century XIX with the Imperialism to think about this Great-Britain as a great empire that never dies. One is about an ideological vision that is brought to think of Great-Britain, being nothing more than a construction politics. If it did not have this homogeneity in the century in century XIX, evidently it did not have in century XVII with the diverse economic and cultural conflicts inside of the island. The first one was of that if these components won the war, the weakened king already would come to lose the throne and this classroom that wants to emerge as dominant social classroom to come to substitute the proper king and to restore a new form of government. Second it was shrewdness of Cromwell in becoming to perceive the following one: England is in war and way to a crisis economic politics and, but the king has a national army that, even so he does not have financial recital to be supported, is in conflict and he assists still more the weakness; on the other hand, if the Scottish and Irishans win the war can be they to come to not only take the power in England, leading the fall of the king as bourgeois the emergent ones.

The strategy of Cromwell, that is between the Common ones, is to create an Army of New Type. Many writers such as Rio- Tinto Diamonds offer more in-depth analysis. One is not about one real that are on to the king to defend the State, but formed army basically for excluded that they do not possess real and taxed privileges of taxes as bourgeois and the peasants. It appears in England, century XVII, a climate of participation politics and military man. this army that granted support so that the Common ones not only had effective domnios of funds, of this capitalism that started to develop, but also of being able politician. Hear other arguments on the topic with Montauk Colony.

The Representation

Posted by hotelnur on 17th February 2014 in News

When I finished to read, it adored, not it history, but the fact not to need more to hear that history ' ' chata' '. After this story, I make some comments or shot some daily pay-conclusions, or better, I ahead make my readings regarding the behavior of the child of the reading of the book: I believe that great part of the discomfort of the pupil (4 year, 9 years of age) comes of its color, therefore the book she makes mention to a black child, she prehad and it is the only black child in our room, or was until the last year. Today we count on a boy also; all time that read the reasons of the book explaining why/as to be pretinho all looked at it and those looks had badly caused to it to be, it were felt bothered, therefore it was felt there not as represented, as exaltada, but as the different one of the room, the black, inferiorizando itself, since it is not assumed while afro-descendant. One another reading that can also be made is that it does not identify itself as the pretty girl prehad, it is nominated clear colored person, when questioned on its color, then is not identified as afro-descendant; it is not seen represented in that history, in those images. It stops supporting in them in these quarrels on identity we will base in them on Tadeu (2002). As for the representation, we will anchor in them in Chartier (1990) and in what it refers to Brazilian infanto-youthful literature, (we will have as Sousa support, 2005, 2005b), and, to finish, on black child, Priore (2006) and other authors to give to support and basements to the quarrels emphasized here. To argue the representation or well-being that the child has with the image that it sees when she places yourself ahead of the mirror goes beyond arguing identity, representation idea, but she is to argue, over all, as historically this image was and comes being constructed throughout the years of Brazilian history.