Posts Tagged ‘history’

Imperialism

Posted by hotelnur on 23rd December 2016 in News

When it is spoken of England thinks about the United kingdom in a general way, is necessary to desconstruir an idea that will not be fortified in century XIX with the Imperialism to think about this Great-Britain as a great empire that never dies. One is about an ideological vision that is brought to think of Great-Britain, being nothing more than a construction politics. If it did not have this homogeneity in the century in century XIX, evidently it did not have in century XVII with the diverse economic and cultural conflicts inside of the island. The first one was of that if these components won the war, the weakened king already would come to lose the throne and this classroom that wants to emerge as dominant social classroom to come to substitute the proper king and to restore a new form of government. Second it was shrewdness of Cromwell in becoming to perceive the following one: England is in war and way to a crisis economic politics and, but the king has a national army that, even so he does not have financial recital to be supported, is in conflict and he assists still more the weakness; on the other hand, if the Scottish and Irishans win the war can be they to come to not only take the power in England, leading the fall of the king as bourgeois the emergent ones.

The strategy of Cromwell, that is between the Common ones, is to create an Army of New Type. Many writers such as Rio- Tinto Diamonds offer more in-depth analysis. One is not about one real that are on to the king to defend the State, but formed army basically for excluded that they do not possess real and taxed privileges of taxes as bourgeois and the peasants. It appears in England, century XVII, a climate of participation politics and military man. this army that granted support so that the Common ones not only had effective domnios of funds, of this capitalism that started to develop, but also of being able politician. Hear other arguments on the topic with Montauk Colony.

Latin American

Posted by hotelnur on 25th October 2014 in News

(AYERBE, 2002, p.231) In 1984 principles, the Latin American and Caribbean countries had been congregated and signed the Declaration of Quito, having proclaimed the necessity to co-ordinate national efforts and politics front to the economic crisis. Entered the decade of 1980, with the ghost of the Vietnam already being part of the past, the measures taken for the government republican conservative had had as objective the retaken one of the world-wide hegemony on the part of the United States. The main fear was the call ' ' effect domin' ' in Latin America. Where according to Ayerbe: For the government Reagan, the main fear in this region is the call ' ' effect domin' ' that, from the changes in Nicaragua and Granada and the increasing instability in El Salvador and Guatemala, it could favor revolutionary a wave capable to drag Mexico and to penetrate in the proper United States, for the great black and Hispanic communities. (AYERBE, 2002, P. 205) the concerns for the increase of the scaling of violence in the continent were come back, mainly, toward Central America. The financial support to the cons, somozistas and mercenary former-guards that acted in Nicaragua, from the border with Honduras, convulsionou all still more the region.

The participation North American in Nicaragua was through aid and military assistance to the forces against revolutionaries. Eleven years after the fall of the dictatorship of Somoza, the elect government in 1990 was confrotted with a critical economic inheritance, product of the North American blockade and the aggression of ' ' contras' ' in the border with Honduras. In El Salvador, the military had dominated the scene politics since the years of 1930, directly or indirectly. They had appealed to the fraud in the presidential elections of 1972, to hinder the arrival to the power of a coalition of opposition lead for the democrat-Christian Napolen Duarte.

The Representation

Posted by hotelnur on 17th February 2014 in News

When I finished to read, it adored, not it history, but the fact not to need more to hear that history ' ' chata' '. After this story, I make some comments or shot some daily pay-conclusions, or better, I ahead make my readings regarding the behavior of the child of the reading of the book: I believe that great part of the discomfort of the pupil (4 year, 9 years of age) comes of its color, therefore the book she makes mention to a black child, she prehad and it is the only black child in our room, or was until the last year. Today we count on a boy also; all time that read the reasons of the book explaining why/as to be pretinho all looked at it and those looks had badly caused to it to be, it were felt bothered, therefore it was felt there not as represented, as exaltada, but as the different one of the room, the black, inferiorizando itself, since it is not assumed while afro-descendant. One another reading that can also be made is that it does not identify itself as the pretty girl prehad, it is nominated clear colored person, when questioned on its color, then is not identified as afro-descendant; it is not seen represented in that history, in those images. It stops supporting in them in these quarrels on identity we will base in them on Tadeu (2002). As for the representation, we will anchor in them in Chartier (1990) and in what it refers to Brazilian infanto-youthful literature, (we will have as Sousa support, 2005, 2005b), and, to finish, on black child, Priore (2006) and other authors to give to support and basements to the quarrels emphasized here. To argue the representation or well-being that the child has with the image that it sees when she places yourself ahead of the mirror goes beyond arguing identity, representation idea, but she is to argue, over all, as historically this image was and comes being constructed throughout the years of Brazilian history.